OnlyPerfct:
OnlyPerfct:
MDM40:
BaudriR:
Omar4800:
BaudriR:
TisTwo:
BaudriR:
Stkmrktlady:
TisTwo:
Stkmrktlady:
BaudriR:
Stkmrktlady:
BaudriR:
TisTwo:
BaudriR:
Omar4800:
BaudriR:
TisTwo:
BaudriR:
TisTwo:
BaudriR:
Omar4800:
BaudriR:
Stkmrktlady:
TisTwo:
BaudriR:
Stkmrktlady:
BaudriR:
TisTwo:
Stkmrktlady:
TisTwo:
BaudriR:
Omar4800:
BaudriR:
TisTwo:
BaudriR:
Stkmrktlady:
BaudriR:
A1924:
TisTwo:
BaudriR:
BaudriR:
Stkmrktlady:
BaudriR:
BaudriR:
TisTwo:
TisTwo:
BaudriR:
Stkmrktlady:
BaudriR:
Stkmrktlady:
TisTwo:
BaudriR:
Omar4800:
TisTwo:
Stkmrktlady:
BaudriR:
Stkmrktlady:
BaudriR:
BaudriR:
Stkmrktlady:
BaudriR:
Sabrini057:
Omar4800:
BaudriR:
Stkmrktlady:
Sabrini057:
BaudriR:
BaudriR:
TisTwo:
BaudriR:
BaudriR:
Stkmrktlady:
BaudriR:
Omar4800:
BaudriR:
Stkmrktlady:
A1924:
Omar4800:
BaudriR:
Stkmrktlady:
BaudriR:
TisTwo:
TisTwo:
Stkmrktlady:
BaudriR:
TisTwo:
BaudriR:
Stkmrktlady:
BaudriR:
Stkmrktlady:
TisTwo:
BaudriR:
Stkmrktlady:
BaudriR:
Stkmrktlady:
BaudriR:
TisTwo:
Stkmrktlady:
Omar4800:
Stkmrktlady:
Stkmrktlady:
|
I'm 15, and I've got $14,000 to invest (not all mine, but I'm 'managing' it) - what should I
do?
So Janus or Vanguard? I'm ready now!
It is with marxist thought,
vanguard is the lo-cost provider of choice
in its successive developments,
Only--get a parent/guardian signature and go mutual funds direct
that the end of the political
only---ur not old enough to legally have ur own account,,must be ugma
MD--lots of other good ones; but so difficult to sort through the prospectus they send
md,,,,diversify,,,,
and of its particular energy was inaugurated.
put some money globally,,,some us large cap
Here began the absolute hegemony of the social and the economic,
yes, listen to Stk, Md, diversify; not all in one mutual fund
and the compulsion,
md left the building
on the part of the political,
MD--are you employed?
to become the legislative,
Omar--wonder if md is with elvis
institutional,
md was actually elvis
executive mirror of the social.
md,,,THERE IS NO PERFECT FUND
lol, wow--what a rush
The autonomy of the political
u have to consider several things
was inversely proportional
was just going to suggest to md that if he/she is employed to get a Roth
ur age,,ur risk factor, ur time frame,,ur needs
too late
to the growing hegemony of the social.
even vanguard's hi yield funds couldn't support elvis'habits
Liberal thought
Omar--nor mine (mine good habits tho)
always thrives on a kind of nostalgic dialectic
roth u cna only do 2000
between the two,
van wogoner
yes, but wonderful for those who quality---tax free; like a gife from God
but socialist thought,
revolutionary thought openly postulates a dissolution of the political
yea,,they are fine,,,,but limited money
at some point in history,
in the final transparency of the social.
Stk, ya know what % of people save/invest nothing; at least a Roth is better than nothing
a start
The social won.
ur right,,
But,
im not arguing
I know
at this point of generalisation
anyone familiar with viacom/cbs?
wish I could have one--the idea of no taxes---wonderful
but all the same for people with money,,itspeanuts
, of saturation,
i own cbs
where it is no more than
the zero degree of the political,
the viacom dela is great marriage
at this point of absolute reference,
STK,no such thing??:)
what will sumner and mel do with their 50% in UPN?
of omnipresence and diffraction
no such thing?
perfect marriage
in all the interstices of physical and mental space,
what becomes of the social itself?
aol + T would be almost perfect marriage
It is the sign of its end:
the energy of the social is reversed,
t alreaay in bed with athm,,,makes no sense to me
its specificity is lost,
and T and ATHM aren't compatible
its historical quality and its ideality vanish
but t owns 40% of athm
noconsumation
conflicts of interest abound
in favour of a configuration
why is it a conflict?
where not only the political becomes volatilised,
yes they do---but want aol to have acess to T funds; T needs to decide what they are going
to do to make it---just gettin hammered
it would be a conflict if aol wasinvolved
but where the social itself
no conflict--both industries have lots of competition
no longer has any name
it seems if t went with aol ,,they wwould be shootig themselves int eh foot
.
makes no sense to me
Stk, maybe; just a thought
Anonymous.
although at this point , the future of athm is questionable
THE MASS.
i wnat to make heavy investment into high speed internet,,,dsl?
THE MASSES.
that's the future Stk, but don't follow dsl
dsl is just starting
BaudriR: are you having fun?
t has become quite a buy lately
really sold off
|
